On “Selling Sunset,” Bre Tiesi raised eyebrows when she claimed that Nick Cannon is not financially obligated to support their child, Legendary Love, because he has a dozen other kids. “The way it works is, like, after 10, the court can basically say he can’t afford to pay child support,” she told co-star Amanza Smith. “Or because he is who he is, they could say, ‘We know you can afford X amount for each for each household.'” Then again, she also shared that she’s more than capable of providing for her child, so it’s not like she’s in dire need of Cannon’s money.
“I take care of myself, and if my son needs something or we need something, I can ask. That’s all I have to do,” she said, adding that Cannon is a “good dad.” She also shared that Cannon is “not [her] sugar daddy” and played no part in her achievements. “I can make crazy money by myself. I can carry my lifestyle, which is not cheap. I can carry my child and my own s**t.”
Read Related Also: Chef launches attack at Benedict Cumberbatch's £3.5m London home
Tiesi’s lawyer, Neama Rahmani, however, refuted her claims and maintained that despite Tiesi’s misunderstanding of the law, Cannon should still render financial support for Legendary Love. “Bre, you should know better!” Rahmani said in an interview with Us Weekly. “That is absolutely not true. There’s no cap on child support based on the number of children. So, to the extent that Nick Cannon can have babies, he owes child support for those babies under California law.”
