REVEALED: What rogue juror who sparked mistrial in the Brittany Higgins and Bruce Lehrmann case told the judge
- Juror brought banned materials to deliberations
- The material looked at frequency of false rape claims
- Conversation between juror and judge has been released
<!–
<!–
<!– <!–
<!–
<!–
<!–
A juror who was responsible for the complete collapse of the rape trial against Bruce Lehrmann told the judge they were ‘deeply sorry’ for bringing banned materials into the jury room.
Mr Lehrmann was tried before a 12-person jury in the ACT Supreme Court in October last year over allegations that he raped Brittany Higgins in Parliament House in March 2019.
He had pleaded not guilty and continues to maintain his innocence.
Chief Justice Lucy McCallum discharged the 12-person jury because one member brought research material into the deliberation room about the frequency of false complaints in sexual assault matters.

Bruce Lehrmann was tried before a 12-person jury in the ACT Supreme Court in October last year over allegations that he raped Brittany Higgins

Chief Justice Lucy McCallum discharged the 12-person jury because one member brought research material into the deliberation room
Read Related Also: Shannon Adams Bio, MAFS, Height, Age, Parents, Job
The juror, who cannot be identified, was questioned by the Justice McCallum in a private hearing.
A transcript of that hearing has now been released by the Board of Inquiry during an investigation into the way the trial was handled by prosecutors and police.
According to a transcript of the exchange, the juror told the judge: ‘I am deeply sorry for this.
‘I’m willing to take responsibility for that, Your Honour, if you feel that that’s appropriate,’ the juror said.
Justice McCallum responded: ‘That’s a matter for you, but I do remind you that it’s an offence to disclose your deliberations.
‘So I would prefer you to preserve your anonymity.’
Mr Lehrmann’s case was heard in the ACT Supreme Court in October last year, but the jury was eventually dismissed after a court officer found banned research material in a folder which belonged to a single juror.
A retrial was scheduled for February this year, but the case was eventually abandoned due to concerns over Ms Higgins’ mental health. Mr Lehrmann has always maintained his innocence.