Reporters against reporting

As David pointed out earlier today, Twitter announced a new policy regarding accounts that track the movements of people in real time. This led to the suspension of an account that tracked the movements of Elon’s personal jet. The decision was prompted by a scary incident in which a stranger in a mask jumped on a car transporting Musk’s young son. Musk also threatened legal action against the college student who ran that account.

This evening there are reports that a group of reporters had their accounts suspended. That group included some well known names.

The accounts of Ryan Mac of The New York Times, Donie O’Sullivan of CNN, Drew Harwell of The Washington Post, Matt Binder of Mashable, Micah Lee of The Intercept and independent journalists Aaron Rupar, Keith Olbermann and Tony Webster had all been suspended as of Thursday evening.

The Twitter account for Mastodon, a platform billed as an alternative, was also suspended early Thursday evening.

It was not immediately clear why the accounts were suspended, though some had been tweeting about the suspension of the Twitter account that tracked Musk’s jet, @ElonJet, and its availability on Mastodon.

Yashar Ali got this screenshot from Rupar who says he has no idea why he was suspended.

Olbermann has been suspended but this alt account might be him.

So what’s going on here exactly? People have pointed out that what many of these folks seem to have in common is that they cover Twitter and Elon Musk.

Musk replied to a tweet from Taylor Lorenz a while ago suggesting these bans were related to doxing his location.

He also said this:

So did all of these journalists actually do that? It’s impossible to tell at this point because their accounts are gone. Lord knows I won’t miss Keith Olberman or Matt Binder but they deserve an explanation for what led to this ban. Otherwise it looks like new Twitter is just making things up, no different than the previous version of Twitter. I’d like to see the specific tweet that got each account in trouble. That doesn’t seem too much to ask, especially when the accounts belong to journalists.

Of course it’s true that Twitter is a private company and Elon can do whatever he wants with it, including banning accounts that piss him off. But Musk’s whole rationale for buying Twitter in the first place to preserve free speech. We just went through five parts of the Twitter Files focused on the idea that free speech wasn’t happening at Twitter because the owners were shadowbanning accounts, etc.

I’m not sure what happened here so I’m not going to draw any final conclusions until we know more. But my reaction based on what we know so far is that these accounts probably deserve as much of a 2nd chance as many of the ones Musk brought back a few weeks ago.

You May Also Like

Scandalous Rumors About JD Vance We Can't Ignore

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images Between…

Where Is Barron? Trump's Youngest Son Has Been Especially Quiet Lately

Pool/Getty President Donald Trump…

Mega Million tickets now jacked up to $5: Here’s what to know

It’ll cost you to hit the jackpot. The price to play Mega…

The man making her smile again! Married At First Sight’s Jamie Marinos lights up as she chats with groom Eliot Donovan after they were caught in bed together following her split with TV husband Dave Hand

Married At First Sight bride Jamie Marinos appears to be smitten with…