Tasmania’s attorney-general has ordered an inquest into the death of a young man who was struck by a car driven by his partner, despite a judge ruling one was not needed.

Family and friends of Jari Wise campaigned for an inquest after he was killed at Huonville, south of Hobart, in 2020.

Wise was hit by a car being driven by Melissa Oates, who then left him on the road.

Family and friends of Jari Wise campaigned for an inquest after he was killed at Huonville, south of Hobart, in 2020. (Nine)

Oates was in April 2021 jailed for eight months after pleading guilty to dangerous driving, drink driving and failing to stop and assist in an accident.

She was found to not be legally responsible for the death of Wise as it could not be ruled out he jumped in front of the car.

Attorney-General Elise Archer on Thursday directed the coroner to hold an inquest, hours after a Supreme Court judge ruled one would not be in the interest of justice.

Wise’s mother, Faith Tkalac, had launched Supreme Court legal action against the coroner in her push for an inquest.

“I’m lost for words. I’m elated, which is difficult for me to say because this is regarding my … child,” she said.

“It’s been such a fight. This has been my every day, my every minute, my every moment.”

Archer said she had been monitoring Supreme Court proceedings but had to wait for an outcome before making her determination.

“I am deeply concerned and acknowledge the impact of these proceedings on the family and friends of Mr Wise,” she said in a statement.

Wise’s mother, Faith Tkalac, had launched Supreme Court legal action against the coroner in her push for an inquest. (AAP)

Archer said she used her powers under the coroners act to direct an inquest.

“I have not made this decision lightly, but it is my sincere belief that this will assist Mr Wise’s loved ones to find the answers that they seek,” she said.

Coroner Simon Cooper investigated Wise’s death and in July 2021 decided not to hold an inquest, partly because it was unlikely to reveal any additional, significant information.

As part of her Supreme Court application, Tkalac claimed there were other witnesses who could provide evidence of Oates threatening to kill Wise on the night he died.

She argued it had never been established whether Wise stepped out in front of the car or whether the crash was deliberate.

In delivering his judgment, Supreme Court of Tasmania Justice Michael Brett said an inquest would not be in the interest of justice.

He ruled the police investigation had been extremely thorough and it became clear evidence did not support the theory Oates was responsible for Wise’s death.

Sign up here to receive our daily newsletters and breaking news alerts, sent straight to your inbox.
You May Also Like

'DELETE DELETE DELETE': Trump's Mass Deregulation Push About to Launch

Great news, as far as it goes. And that’s the question…

New England serial killer fears grow as police downplay threat encroaching on wealthy coastal enclaves

Speculation about a serial killer in New England is gaining significant traction online –…

Drew's son caught the moment a snake bit him square on the face

In the seven years he’s been catching snakes, Drew Godfrey has been…

Joe Biden Returns: Accuses Trump of Wrecking Social Security to Rob It!

Those poor, beleaguered Democrats were wandering through the political wilderness, desperately…