‘That means they’ve done nothing’: Judge lashes out at Trump admin for refusing to comply with SCOTUS orders, demands daily updates on status of wrongly deported dad

Main: President Donald Trump during an event on energy production in the East Room of the White House, Tuesday, April 8, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon). Inset: Kilmar Abrego Abrego Garcia in undated photo (CASA).

Main: President Donald Trump during an event on energy production in the East Room of the White House, Tuesday, April 8, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon). Inset: Kilmar Abrego Garcia in undated photo (CASA).

A federal judge in Maryland on Tuesday took the Trump administration to task, accusing Justice Department attorneys of intentionally ignoring a court order to produce information regarding the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to a notorious work prison in El Salvador.

U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis rejected many of the government’s proposed objections to Abrego Garcia’s discovery requests and denounced the DOJ’s “mischaracterization” of the Supreme Court’s order from earlier this month requiring the government to “facilitate” the Maryland father’s release from El Salvador.

“Defendants’ objection reflects a willful and bad faith refusal to comply with discovery obligations,” Xinis wrote in the eight-page order, referring to the government’s repeated attempts to interpret the high court’s ruling as only requiring them to remove domestic obstacles preventing Abrego Garcia’s return. The judge overruled the objection, ordering the Justice Department to supplement its answers to include “facts responsive to the requests, not oblique and incomplete, non-specific characterizations.”

Taking aim at the administration’s numerous “specious” assertions of privilege to avoid answering questions, Xinis said the responses directly contravened specific instructions from the court.

“Given that this Court expressly warned Defendants and their counsel to adhere strictly to their discovery obligations … their boilerplate, non-particularized objections are presumptively invalid and reflect a willful refusal to comply with this Court’s Discovery Order and governing rules,” Xinis wrote. “For weeks, Defendants have sought refuge behind vague and unsubstantiated assertions of privilege, using them as a shield to obstruct discovery and evade compliance with this Court’s orders. Defendants have known, at least since last week, that this Court requires specific legal and factual showings to support any claim of privilege. Yet they have continued to rely on boilerplate assertions. That ends now.”

The government is also refusing to divulge the person or persons responsible for authorizing Abrego Garcia’s removal to El Salvador, which Xinis called “a deliberate evasion of their fundamental discovery obligations.”

You May Also Like

Her Body Was Found 3 Years After She Disappeared. Now Her Husband Is Accused Of Murder — Again

DENVER (AP) — The husband of a Colorado woman, Suzanne Morphew, whose…

Smartphones vs. ICE

By Allissa V. Richardson It has been five years since May 25,…

'I'm so pimpish': Man beat on sex trafficking victim's face to keep her in line while bragging about his ill-gotten gains on social media

Inset: Cedric Dorsey II (Bellevue Police Department). Background: Dorsey poses with a…

Law&Crime expands leadership team, taps unscripted veteran Marco Bresaz and AI strategist Debasish Mishra to spearhead growth

Left: Debasish Mishra; Right: Marco Bresaz (Law&Crime) Law&Crime, the top true crime…