‘That means they’ve done nothing’: Judge lashes out at Trump admin for refusing to comply with SCOTUS orders, demands daily updates on status of wrongly deported dad

Main: President Donald Trump during an event on energy production in the East Room of the White House, Tuesday, April 8, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon). Inset: Kilmar Abrego Abrego Garcia in undated photo (CASA).

Main: President Donald Trump during an event on energy production in the East Room of the White House, Tuesday, April 8, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon). Inset: Kilmar Abrego Garcia in undated photo (CASA).

A federal judge in Maryland on Tuesday took the Trump administration to task, accusing Justice Department attorneys of intentionally ignoring a court order to produce information regarding the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to a notorious work prison in El Salvador.

U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis rejected many of the government’s proposed objections to Abrego Garcia’s discovery requests and denounced the DOJ’s “mischaracterization” of the Supreme Court’s order from earlier this month requiring the government to “facilitate” the Maryland father’s release from El Salvador.

“Defendants’ objection reflects a willful and bad faith refusal to comply with discovery obligations,” Xinis wrote in the eight-page order, referring to the government’s repeated attempts to interpret the high court’s ruling as only requiring them to remove domestic obstacles preventing Abrego Garcia’s return. The judge overruled the objection, ordering the Justice Department to supplement its answers to include “facts responsive to the requests, not oblique and incomplete, non-specific characterizations.”

Taking aim at the administration’s numerous “specious” assertions of privilege to avoid answering questions, Xinis said the responses directly contravened specific instructions from the court.

“Given that this Court expressly warned Defendants and their counsel to adhere strictly to their discovery obligations … their boilerplate, non-particularized objections are presumptively invalid and reflect a willful refusal to comply with this Court’s Discovery Order and governing rules,” Xinis wrote. “For weeks, Defendants have sought refuge behind vague and unsubstantiated assertions of privilege, using them as a shield to obstruct discovery and evade compliance with this Court’s orders. Defendants have known, at least since last week, that this Court requires specific legal and factual showings to support any claim of privilege. Yet they have continued to rely on boilerplate assertions. That ends now.”

The government is also refusing to divulge the person or persons responsible for authorizing Abrego Garcia’s removal to El Salvador, which Xinis called “a deliberate evasion of their fundamental discovery obligations.”

You May Also Like

Texas Politician Allegedly Stabbed, Husband Killed By Grandson

A Texas politician was allegedly stabbed by her grandson Monday morning in…

Gabby Petito’s Mom Says Brian Laundrie’s Room Was Completely ‘Cleared Out’ Before Cops Searched Home

Gabby Petito’s mother, Nichole Schmidt, alleged this week that Brian Laundrie’s parents…

Missing mom of 2 found dead in wooded area leads to charges against 2 men, including her boyfriend who reported her missing: Police

Keycy Robinson Alexi Barrera-Rosa, Lesbia Mileth Ramirez Guerra, and Rolvin Eduardo Bererra-Bererra…

‘No mere technical violation’: Trump’s cabinet members trying to ‘shield their actions from public scrutiny’ with continued use of auto-deleting Signal group chats, watchdog alleges

President Donald Trump listens as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks in the…