One of 2024's most eagerly anticipated launches, Netflix's 3 Body Problem, from the Game Of Thrones creators, had high expectations to live up to. But the crime-science flick, based on the Chinese bestselling novels, has fallen flat, with critics slamming its complex plot and moments of 'teeth-grinding boredom'.

Advertisement

One of 2024's most eagerly anticipated launches, Netflix's 3 Body Problem, from the Game Of Thrones creators, had high expectations to live up to. But the crime-science flick, based on the Chinese bestselling novels, has fallen flat, with critics slamming its complex plot and moments of 'teeth-grinding boredom'.

One of 2024’s most eagerly anticipated launches, Netflix’s 3 Body Problem, from the Game Of Thrones creators, had high expectations to live up to. But the crime-science flick, based on the Chinese bestselling novels, has fallen flat, with critics slamming its complex plot and moments of ‘teeth-grinding boredom’.

The eight-part series, which reportedly had a budget of £125million, begins in Communist China during the height of mad despot Chairman Mao's genocide in the 1960s, before leaping forward to Britain in the present day where scientists are being driven out of their senses, and killed, by unexplained phenomena. Computer engineer and science fiction writer Liu Ciux's The Three-Body Problem - the first in a trilogy of novels called Remembrance of Earth's Past - was firmly placed in the 'unadaptable' category due to being filled to the brim with scientific jargon.

The eight-part series, which reportedly had a budget of £125million, begins in Communist China during the height of mad despot Chairman Mao’s genocide in the 1960s, before leaping forward to Britain in the present day where scientists are being driven out of their senses, and killed, by unexplained phenomena. Computer engineer and science fiction writer Liu Ciux’s The Three-Body Problem – the first in a trilogy of novels called Remembrance of Earth’s Past – was firmly placed in the ‘unadaptable’ category due to being filled to the brim with scientific jargon.

But it is a challenge Game of Thrones duo David Benioff and DB Weiss were determined to conquer. Whether they succeeded or not remains to be seen. The Netflix series, which dropped on the streaming site on Thursday, has been criticized by reviewers for managing to both be dull and too confusing. Writing for the Daily Mail, Christopher Stevens said: 'Like a rocket disintegrating on lift-off, the show promptly hurtles off in several directions at once ¿ with some parts plowing straight into the ground.

But it is a challenge Game of Thrones duo David Benioff and DB Weiss were determined to conquer. Whether they succeeded or not remains to be seen. The Netflix series, which dropped on the streaming site on Thursday, has been criticized by reviewers for managing to both be dull and too confusing. Writing for the Daily Mail, Christopher Stevens said: ‘Like a rocket disintegrating on lift-off, the show promptly hurtles off in several directions at once – with some parts plowing straight into the ground.

Benioff and Weiss have no idea whether they're making a philosophical thriller, a historical epic about the cultural revolution, a bog-standard crime drama (complete with shambling, chain-smoking maverick copper who has one last chance to save his career), a rom-com, a horror movie or a trailer for a video game. 'The result is that everything looks derivative and unconvincing. Worst of all, as the British researchers tell each other repeatedly that "science is broken", there are long stretches of teeth-grinding boredom.'

Benioff and Weiss have no idea whether they’re making a philosophical thriller, a historical epic about the cultural revolution, a bog-standard crime drama (complete with shambling, chain-smoking maverick copper who has one last chance to save his career), a rom-com, a horror movie or a trailer for a video game. ‘The result is that everything looks derivative and unconvincing. Worst of all, as the British researchers tell each other repeatedly that “science is broken”, there are long stretches of teeth-grinding boredom.’

The Independent's Louis Chilton echoed his sentiments with a damning review, writing: 'No book is really unadaptable; the problem is that rendering it on screen will simply be too dull, or confusing and 3 Body Problem is somehow both. Benioff, Weiss and Woo made radical and transformative changes to the source material, but lost something integral in the process. 'We're left with a series that's full of bluster but no vibrancy ¿ a body devoid of life.' Writing for The Guardian, Lucy Mangan slammed the writers' attempt at emulating their Games Of Thrones success.

The Independent’s Louis Chilton echoed his sentiments with a damning review, writing: ‘No book is really unadaptable; the problem is that rendering it on screen will simply be too dull, or confusing and 3 Body Problem is somehow both. Benioff, Weiss and Woo made radical and transformative changes to the source material, but lost something integral in the process. ‘We’re left with a series that’s full of bluster but no vibrancy – a body devoid of life.’ Writing for The Guardian, Lucy Mangan slammed the writers’ attempt at emulating their Games Of Thrones success.

She wrote: 'There are puzzles to solve, if you are capable, but nothing and no one to root for. 'Even its design as a metaphor for the climate crisis and human inertia in the face of potential doom doesn't give it enough heft ¿ in fact, such is the way of these things, it may even serve to alienate us further from emotional engagement. It won't be Netflix's answer to Game of Thrones.' And Dan Einav of the Financial Times said: 'While the series initially manages to offset early confusion with gripping suspense, slick pacing and well-timed reveals, it becomes unwieldy as it progresses.

She wrote: ‘There are puzzles to solve, if you are capable, but nothing and no one to root for. ‘Even its design as a metaphor for the climate crisis and human inertia in the face of potential doom doesn’t give it enough heft – in fact, such is the way of these things, it may even serve to alienate us further from emotional engagement. It won’t be Netflix’s answer to Game of Thrones.’ And Dan Einav of the Financial Times said: ‘While the series initially manages to offset early confusion with gripping suspense, slick pacing and well-timed reveals, it becomes unwieldy as it progresses. 

'Characters saddled with explaining abstruse mechanical theories, meanwhile, never really seem to have more than one dimension themselves.' Not all critics were underwhelmed, however, with several commending the much-anticipated series. The i's Emily Baker applauded the series, writing: 'It's fast-paced, zooming through storylines and ideas at breakneck speed. Thankfully, the whole season is available to binge ¿ I don't think I could've stood to wait a week for each chapter. It's not just mind-bending, it's mind-melting ¿ in the most enjoyable way.'

‘Characters saddled with explaining abstruse mechanical theories, meanwhile, never really seem to have more than one dimension themselves.’ Not all critics were underwhelmed, however, with several commending the much-anticipated series. The i’s Emily Baker applauded the series, writing: ‘It’s fast-paced, zooming through storylines and ideas at breakneck speed. Thankfully, the whole season is available to binge – I don’t think I could’ve stood to wait a week for each chapter. It’s not just mind-bending, it’s mind-melting – in the most enjoyable way.’ 

Although its plot complexity was heavily criticized, Empire's John Nugent felt the weaving of storylines was successful. He wrote: 'It is part police-procedural potboiler, part historical-fiction epic, part puzzle-box mystery, part scientific-discovery adventure, part alien-invasion sci-fi. That it feels coherent at all is an achievement. At its heart lies the question of what it means to be human.'

Although its plot complexity was heavily criticized, Empire’s John Nugent felt the weaving of storylines was successful. He wrote: ‘It is part police-procedural potboiler, part historical-fiction epic, part puzzle-box mystery, part scientific-discovery adventure, part alien-invasion sci-fi. That it feels coherent at all is an achievement. At its heart lies the question of what it means to be human.’

Want more stories like this from the Daily Mail? Visit our profile page and hit the follow button above for more of the news you need.

Want more stories like this from the Daily Mail? Visit our profile page and hit the follow button above for more of the news you need.

You May Also Like

‘There’s a baby’: Gravedigger desecrated infant’s corpse and dumped it over hillside after hitting casket during dig, cops say

Inset: Matthew Fortner (West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation). Background: The…

‘He died in his brother’s arms’: Teen stabbed to death at track meet during fight over bleacher seating, police say

Background: News footage of the crime scene at Kuykendall Stadium in Frisco,…

‘Crimped view of the law’: Judge trashes Trump admin’s ‘Kafkaesque’ legal arguments in case over ‘blatantly lawless’ Privacy Act violations committed by DOGE and OPM

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, left, and Republican presidential nominee former…

Man found beaten to death in cooler behind bar by workers dropping off ice: Cops

Share copy link Inset: Oscar Rivera-Peraza (Miami-Dade Corrections and Rehabilitation). Background: The…