‘A problem of your own making’: Judge prepares to block Trump’s funding freeze over ‘sideshow’ memo that caused chaos and confusion

President Donald Trump holds up a signed executive order in the Oval Office of the White House, Monday, Feb. 3, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Evan Vucci).

President Donald Trump holds up a signed executive order in the Oval Office of the White House, Monday, Feb. 3, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Evan Vucci).

Another federal judge has slammed the brakes on Donald Trump’s crusade against gender-affirming care last week, halting the executive order that the president issued in January banning federal medical support for transgender youths under the age of 19. She explained why on Sunday, saying the move is “unconstitutional” and prevents transgender youth from obtaining necessary medical treatments that are “completely unrelated” to their gender identity.

“For example, a cisgender teen could obtain puberty blockers from a federally funded medical provider as a component of cancer treatment, but a transgender teen with the same cancer care plan could not,” wrote U.S. District Court Judge Lauren King in a memorandum opinion explaining her decision to issue a temporary restraining order Friday in favor of three states and three doctors who sued the government on Feb. 7 over the executive order.

King, a Joe Biden appointee, paused the gender-affirming care ban after a lawsuit was filed last week in Seattle by the state’s attorney general, Nick Brown, in the Western U.S. District of Washington. Brown blasted Trump’s order as being “clearly illegal and unusually cruel.” His office said Friday in a statement that the order “directs unconstitutional criminal enforcement” against medical professionals and patients, while hailing King’s ruling.