Federal judge strikes down DeSantis transgender medical ban, denounces ‘frenzied’ discriminatory rhetoric

Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis speaks at an annual Basque Fry at the Corley Ranch in Gardnerville, Nev., Saturday, June 17, 2023. (AP Photo/Andy Barron, File)

A federal judge in Florida struck down a key part of Ron DeSantis’s “war on woke” Tuesday when the court ruled that Florida could not restrict transgender medical care.

U.S. District Judge Robert L. Hinkle, a Bill Clinton appointee, penned a 105-page order that declared Florida’s 2023 law unconstitutional and across the voluminous document, the judge spared no opportunity to detail the discriminatory intent held by the lawmakers who adopted the statute.

DeSantis’ law and the courtroom challenge

Florida’s Republican governor signed SB 254 into law in May 2023. It banned medical care for transgender adolescents and restricted it for transgender adults. The law also barred doctors and nurses from prescribing or administering transition-related medication to those under 18 and exposed medical providers to criminal liability and professional discipline if they violated the statute’s restrictions.

Eleven plaintiffs — four transgender adults, and seven parents of transgender minors — filed suit against the Florida surgeon general, the state’s medical boards, and government officials, challenging the constitutionality of the law.

Last May, Hinkle issued a preliminary injunction protecting the continuing medical care of the seven transgender children at issue while the lawsuit made its way through the court.

‘Gender identity is real’

Tuesday’s ruling permanently blocks Florida from enforcing the law.

In his lengthy opinion, Hinkle reiterated that “gender identity is real,” and said that a “widely accepted standard of care” includes puberty blockers and hormone treatments that the statute would have banned.

Hinkle focused his opinion first on the basic concept of gender identity, explaining it in exceedingly basic terms.

“For more than 99% of people, the external sex characteristics and chromosomes — the determinants of what this order calls the person’s natal sex — match the person’s gender identity,” Hinkle said.

Hinkle next summed up the erroneous viewpoint that underlaid Florida’s statute: some believe that cisgender individuals “properly adhere to” their sex assigned at birth while transgender people “inappropriately” choose their gender identity, “just as one might choose whether to read Shakespeare or Grisham.”

“Many people with this view tend to disapprove all things transgender and so oppose medical care that supports a person’s transgender existence,” the judge explained.

Hinkle likened “denial that transgender identity is real” to racism and misogyny and noted that those who engage in such denial sometimes invoke religion to support their position, “just as some once invoked religion to support their racism or misogyny.”