‘False and repugnant’: States and doctors team up to block Trump’s executive order on transgender medical care, lawsuit seeks permanent injunction

Donald Trump at a press conference.

President Donald Trump listens during a news conference with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba in the East Room of the White House, Friday, Feb. 7, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon).

Despite the federal government dismissing the criminal cases against Donald Trump after his 2024 election victory, the world may soon find out more about the former and current president’s alleged mishandling of confidential documents — including whether he “flushed some presidential records down the toilet” during his first stint in office.

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Monday ordered the FBI to release records the bureau had previously withheld in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by investigative journalist Jason Leopold.

Ironically, it was Trump’s victory over Joe Biden in conjunction with the U.S. Supreme Court’s sweeping ruling granting a sitting president immunity from prosecution for official acts — litigation instigated by Trump — that formed the basis for the court’s holding in the FOIA case.

In a 26-page order, U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell reasoned that because Trump (and the co-defendants he pardoned after taking office) were no longer in danger of being prosecuted for the alleged retention of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago home in Florida, the federal government could no longer prevent the disclosure of the documents requested by Leopold.

“Despite filling nearly 400 pages, including exhibits and declarations, briefing in this case fell behind developments in the real world that carry fatal consequences for the agency’s proffered rationale for withholding records responsive to a request under the Freedom of Information Act,” Howell wrote. “Absent correct application of an exemption, disclosure is required to allow the American people to learn about actions of government officials that the officials themselves may not otherwise want to be made public. As the D.C. Circuit has long made clear: ‘One basic general assumption of the FOIA is that, in many important public matters, it is for the public to know and then to judge.””

You May Also Like

Relatively Low Fluoride Levels May Affect Intelligence in Children

Fluoride occurs naturally in drinking water, especially well water, but the concentrations…

‘They’re going to lose lots of dues’: Judge appears skeptical of government arguments over Trump executive order stripping collective bargaining rights from federal workers

UNITED STATES – MARCH 4: President Donald Trump arrives to deliver his…

‘Worthy of a 3-year-old’: Trump administration shredded over ‘temper tantrum’ behavior in Perkins Coie case that firm blasts as ‘national insecurity’

Left: FILE – In this Dec. 11, 2007 file photo, Commissioner Beryl…

Murder case dropped because of ‘ongoing staffing crisis’ at prosecutor’s office: Docs

Kevin Maddox (left) and Amber Brigham (Kokomo Police Department). The family of…