Couple's Lawsuit Seeks Damages For 'Wrongful Conception' After Failed Vasectomy

A Minnesota couple’s “wrongful conception” lawsuit accuses a urology practice of misinforming them about the success of the husband’s vasectomy, resulting in an unplanned pregnancy and the birth of their fourth child.

The lawsuit, which is headed to trial on Monday, was filed in 2023 in Minnesota state court by Steven and Megan Szlachtowski, who want Minnesota Urology to pay costs associated with raising their child. According to a court document, a nurse at the practice who has since died misinformed them after the procedure in 2018 that it had been successful. Megan Szlachtowski, under the impression they could have sex without contraception, became pregnant several years later.

Minnesota Urology is being sued over an unplanned pregnancy after a vasectomy.
Minnesota Urology is being sued over an unplanned pregnancy after a vasectomy.

In December 2018, the couple, who were already raising three children, decided Steven would undergo a vasectomy. In May 2019, the couple received the post-procedure test results from nurse Jennifer Whelchel, who said it was “ok to discontinue contraceptives,” according to the lawsuit.

However, the test was actually positive for the presence of live sperm, both sides in the lawsuit agree. Almost four years later, in March 2023, Megan learned she was 15 weeks pregnant.

Both sides agree that the urology practice was negligent when it misinformed the couple about the post-procedure test results and that the mistake led to Megan’s pregnancy, according to a stipulation filed in the suit. If the trial takes place as scheduled, it will focus on what, if any, damages the couple is owed.

The complaint alleged that Whelchel was improperly trained and cited a number of reports that she showed up to work smelling of alcohol or had been late to work without an excuse. But in an order in September, the judge ruled that the couple could not seek punitive damages in the case, finding there wasn’t evidence that the urology practice knew of or deliberately disregarded evidence that Whelchel was unfit. The nurse died in 2022.

Though punitive damages are off the table, the couple is continuing to seek compensation related to raising their fourth child. The complaint says they’ve already faced costs of at least $50,000, and a proposed special verdict form describes medical expenses, emotional distress, pain, discomfort and child-rearing costs until the child turns 18.

As a result of the unplanned pregnancy, Megan has not applied for job opportunities, the suit says. The couple alleges she suffered other physical consequences from the pregnancy.

Your Support Has Never Been More Critical

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can’t do it without you.

You’ve supported HuffPost before, and we’ll be honest — we could use your help again. We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can’t do it without you.

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You’ve supported HuffPost before, and we’ll be honest — we could use your help again. We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can’t do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

Attorneys representing Minnesota Urology and the couple did not immediately respond to HuffPost’s requests for comment.

Richard Thomas, the lawyer representing Minnesota Urology, told The Minneapolis Star Tribune he was “a little surprised” by the couple’s lawsuit “but they have every right to pursue what they want to pursue.”

Minnesota is one of several states that recognize “wrongful conception” as a legal argument. In 1977, the state codified the Minnesota Supreme Court’s decision in Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic, which dealt with a similar situation of a child born after a failed sterilization procedure.

The case determined that courts must balance the economic costs parents derived from the joy of having a child born out of “wrongful conception” against the cost required to raise the child.

You May Also Like

Woman Charged With Murder 2 Years After She Reported Roommate Missing

Orlando police say they discovered “significant evidence” of violence when Runyleidy Medina-Pacheco…

Man Arrested After 9 People Stabbed In Seattle

SEATTLE (AP) — A man has been arrested in connection with a…

VERDICT WATCH: Delphi Jury Ends 1st Full Day of Deliberations Without Verdict

Five men and seven women ended their first full day of deliberations…

‘As a result of the election’: Jack Smith is calling it quits in Jan. 6 case against Trump — cites ‘Department of Justice policy’

Left: Jack Smith speaks about an indictment of former President Donald Trump,…