‘Abuses of the criminal justice process’: Trump DOJ probing Tina Peters election conspiracy case and state conviction

Left: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a joint press conference with Britain

Left: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a joint press conference with Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer in the East Room at the White House Thursday, Feb. 27, 2025, in Washington (Carl Court/Pool Photo via AP). Right: Former Mesa County Clerk and Recorder Tina Peters looks on during sentencing for her election interference case at the Mesa County District Court Thursday, Oct. 3, 2024, in Grand Junction, Colo. (Larry Robinson/The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel via AP).

President Donald Trump’s Justice Department is probing the state conviction of Tina Peters — the first election official found guilty of a felony over 2020 election conspiracy theories — to see if there were “abuses of the criminal justice process” and a legal bias “toward inflicting political pain,” the DOJ says.

Peters, 69, was convicted last August on seven counts of engaging in a security breach related to unauthorized access to voting machines while she worked as a county clerk in Mesa County, Colorado. In October — after a marathon hearing in which Peters repeatedly expressed defiance and stuck to her theories — Peters was sentenced to nine years in state prison for her felony offenses.

“I am convinced you would do it all over again if you could,” U.S. District Judge Matthew Barrett told Peters at her sentencing.

“You’re as defiant as any defendant this court has ever seen,” Barrett blasted. “You are no hero. You abused your position and you’re a charlatan.”

More from Law&Crime: ‘Rogue use of executive authority’: Trump DOJ rips judge for deeming Biden watchdog firing ‘illegal’ and pressures DC Circuit to respond before SCOTUS showdown

On Monday, DOJ lawyers filed a “Statement of Interest” in the District of Colorado announcing its review of Peters’ case — saying “reasonable concerns” have been raised recently regarding her conviction and incarceration.

“These concerns relate to, among other things, the exceptionally lengthy sentence imposed relative to the conduct at issue, the First Amendment implications of the trial court’s October 2024 assertions relating to Ms. Peters, and whether Colorado’s denial of bail pending appeal was arbitrary or unreasonable under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments such that relief is appropriate,” the filing said.

You May Also Like

‘He’s getting ready to do something’: Man killed mother and 15-year-old brother just days after being released from prison, police say

Background: News footage of the home where Dana Jenkins and her son…

Teacher hired high school student to kill her husband, provided ‘down payment’ and details on when kids would be out of the house: Police

Inset: Stephanie Demetrius (Franklin County Sheriff’s Office). Background: The Academy for Urban…

How Tariffs Wreck Trust in the United States

President Donald Trump unveiled a sweeping new tariff plan on April 2,…

The very personal meaning of Underbelly crime boss 'Fat' Tony Mokbel's first trip outside as a free man in 18 YEARS – as he makes up for one of his biggest regrets in life

Melbourne crime boss Tony Mokbel wasted no time in making amends for the…