‘Abuses of the criminal justice process’: Trump DOJ probing Tina Peters election conspiracy case and state conviction

Left: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a joint press conference with Britain

Left: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a joint press conference with Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer in the East Room at the White House Thursday, Feb. 27, 2025, in Washington (Carl Court/Pool Photo via AP). Right: Former Mesa County Clerk and Recorder Tina Peters looks on during sentencing for her election interference case at the Mesa County District Court Thursday, Oct. 3, 2024, in Grand Junction, Colo. (Larry Robinson/The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel via AP).

President Donald Trump’s Justice Department is probing the state conviction of Tina Peters — the first election official found guilty of a felony over 2020 election conspiracy theories — to see if there were “abuses of the criminal justice process” and a legal bias “toward inflicting political pain,” the DOJ says.

Peters, 69, was convicted last August on seven counts of engaging in a security breach related to unauthorized access to voting machines while she worked as a county clerk in Mesa County, Colorado. In October — after a marathon hearing in which Peters repeatedly expressed defiance and stuck to her theories — Peters was sentenced to nine years in state prison for her felony offenses.

“I am convinced you would do it all over again if you could,” U.S. District Judge Matthew Barrett told Peters at her sentencing.

“You’re as defiant as any defendant this court has ever seen,” Barrett blasted. “You are no hero. You abused your position and you’re a charlatan.”

More from Law&Crime: ‘Rogue use of executive authority’: Trump DOJ rips judge for deeming Biden watchdog firing ‘illegal’ and pressures DC Circuit to respond before SCOTUS showdown

On Monday, DOJ lawyers filed a “Statement of Interest” in the District of Colorado announcing its review of Peters’ case — saying “reasonable concerns” have been raised recently regarding her conviction and incarceration.

“These concerns relate to, among other things, the exceptionally lengthy sentence imposed relative to the conduct at issue, the First Amendment implications of the trial court’s October 2024 assertions relating to Ms. Peters, and whether Colorado’s denial of bail pending appeal was arbitrary or unreasonable under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments such that relief is appropriate,” the filing said.

You May Also Like

The Justice Department Is Planning to Strip Citizenship from Naturalized Americans

By Cassandra Burke Robertson and Irina D. Manta The Trump administration wants…

'Prevented him from having a chance': Uncle killed nephew during road trip after getting permission to care from him by the state, authorities say

Background: The area around County Road 39 and County Road 8 in…

'You've destroyed it': Irate judge repeatedly jabs DOJ lawyer for violations and inaccuracies during Abrego Garcia hearing

Inset: Kilmar Abrego Garcia in an undated photo (CASA). Background: President Donald…