KHLOE Kardashian’s best friend, Malika Haqq, may have “mistakenly” confirmed the TV star’s baby’s name.
Malika, 40, recently commented on Khloe’s, 38, most recent Instagram post.
4
4
In the snaps, Khloe posed with her one-year-old son — which The U.S. Sun exclusively revealed earlier this month that his name is Tatum Robert Thompson — while wearing a small t-shirt and baggy jeans.
While Khloe hasn’t confirmed his name yet herself, Malika might have.
However, fans noticed her comment that read: “Go Tate!”
CONFIRMATION?
In a popular Kardashian internet forum, one fan posted the comment and asked: “Did Malika accidentally confirm the baby’s name?”
“It has to be, right??? Doesn’t seem like a typo & combined with the rumor,” said another.
On the contrary, one fan believed that it wasn’t an accident.
A fan pointed out, “I doubt it was an accident. Malika is a true ride or die and if it was accidental it would’ve been immediately deleted.”
NICE SHIRT!
In the photo Malika commented on, Khloe gave fans a rare glimpse of Tatum
She held her ten-month-old son in her arms as she posed for some Instagram pictures in her kitchen.
Khlo held tiny Tatum in her left arm, as the toddler played with his mom’s long blond hair.
Tatum kept his back to the camera, displaying a full head of dark hair himself.
Khloe rocked a pair of holey jeans from her Good American collection, including a link to the brand’s Instagram page.
But it was the Kim T-shirt that got the most attention.
The model and businesswoman captured the post with a tongue-in-cheek: “In my best Kim K voice!”
In the comments section, fans got themselves worked up.
Read Related Also: Alabama Barker, 17, sends defiant message to ‘haters’ after sparking concern with ‘inappropriate’ new photos
“I need that shirt! Lol.” one person exclaimed, as another added: “Need that shirt ASAP.”
A third cried out: “Omg that shirt. @khloekardashian is an absolute queen!”
Khloe’s pants, however, were not as well received, with one fan slamming her holier than thou pants: “Koko,come on now, you can afford some new jeans.”
FILTER FURY
Earlier this month, Khloe posted a never-before-seen selfie of her five-year-old daughter True and baby boy Tatum.
Khlo simply captioned the post with three “teddy bear” emojis.
The picture captured the Hulu star smirking at the camera as her daughter True grinned from ear to ear as they relaxed outside in the sunshine.
Tatum was shown looking off to the side while wearing a firefighter hat, no doubt from his cousin Psalm’s 4th birthday party, as the snapshot was taken.
Khloe donned a tight-fitting white long-sleeve shirt for the photo as little Tatum wore a camouflage print sweater and a light tan beanie — that was nearly hidden underneath his fire brigade attire.
While many of Khloe’s fans left gushing comments on the post, when one person reshared it on Reddit, people’s thoughts were less complimentary.
“I know this gets commented a lot but it is actually so sad to filter/edit yourself in family photos lol like your beautiful babies are in the photo with you and you still aren’t confident in your own skin,” one person said.
Another person replied and added: “I also feel so bad for her children who won’t have unedited pictures of her OR themselves as they grow up. Sad.”
A third Reddit user questioned: “I’m wondering if trues cheeks are naturally blushed. Or is it the filter,” to which someone else replied and claimed: “No way that’s natural.”
Another person asked: “Why is True wearing makeup?” as someone else responded: “I’m thinking it’s a filter?”
“Either way it’s f**ked. And Khloe of all of them should know better,” a different person fumed.
Another critic predicted: “Her kids will be so confused when they grow up and see how many times their mom changed her looks.”
Someone else joked: “Lol you sure that’s her? Doesn’t even look like her anymore.”
4
4
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;
n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,
document,’script’,’
fbq(‘init’, ‘752905198150451’);
fbq(‘track’, “PageView”);
