GWEN Stefani has frightened her fans with a shocking up close and personal clip of her face on TikTok.
The singer has been showing off her real skin texture and natural features in her social media posts recently.

3

3

3
But Gwen, 53, took a much more filtered approach on TikTok over the weekend as she promoted her new single “True Babe.”
The Voice star used a shocking filter to completely change her appearance, as she joked that the caveman-esque look was her style “before” listening to her upbeat new track.
The mother of one swayed back and forth as she waited for the beat to drop when all of a sudden her face switched to a full glam filter.
She looked much more normal, though a little over the top with her makeup and hairstyle as she sang the lyrics to her song.


Gwen wrote “vs after” with a kissy face on the screen, claiming that fans would look just as glamorous after listening to her single.
FAN COMMENTS
But her followers were stunned after seeing the transformation, taking to the comments to share their surprise.
“I was like Gwen….?” one admitted with laughing emojis.
“Shocked at first but you are still pretty no matter what,” a second confessed.
“I thought you had a little work done there at first,” a third agreed.
“Aw hell nah Gwen,” a fourth complained, while a fifth said: “Wow that’s scary.”
“Girl I thought I was watching White Chicks for a second,” a final remarked.
NATURAL BEAUTY
Despite Gwen’s filtered faux-pas, the songwriter has recently been trending toward more natural selfies.
Over the July 4th weekend, the TV personality posted new photos of her and her husband Blake Shelton celebrating America.
The 53-year-old shared the snaps on her Instagram as she soaked up the sun at the lake.
The singer created a gallery of photos from her Independence Day events.
Read Related Also: Kim Kardashian accused of ‘stealing’ sister Kourtney’s look with drastic change to her appearance after bitter rivalry
The pics include several selfies of her and her husband Blake, 47, while on the shore and on a boat.
There was also a photo of a bowl of green olives with an American flag toothpick.
Gwen was decked out in several red, white, and blue outfits including a straw hat and a red and white striped top.
The country singer chose to wear two Hawaiian shirts to the lake.
In the first photo of the former The Voice judges, it appeared that Gwen didn’t edit her face.
Her smile was huge, her skin looked natural, and the lines around her eyes were in full view.
FAN COMPLIMENTS
Fans in Gwen’s comment section loved to see the singer’s unedited look, but some shared critiques.
One commented: “Love you both and love you with less makeup.”
Someone else wrote: “Happy 4th!! You guys look so relaxed, healthy, and happy!! Best wishes to a beautiful couple inside and out!!”
A third eagle-eyed and sarcastic fan said: “Are those outgrown acrylics I see in Gwen? How dare she!!!”
Another said: “Love ya Gx, time to get your nails filled!”
PHOTO FILTER MAGIC?
In late June, Gwen shut down critics’ accusations that she overly alters her photos.
The music star posted a few snaps of her performing overseas in a photo dump released on Instagram.
Included on Gwen’s carousel post were collage pics that flaunted her either rocking out on stage in the UK or smiling for a photo-op outside of her concert.
On the third slide of the social media post, three snaps were combined together.
The background and lower corner pics were different stills of Gwen singing on stage.
However, the image in the upper corner showed the dressed-down Grammy winner posing beside fellow Grammy-winning rapper Eve, 44.


Gwen’s skin had minimal makeup on it, appearing to be smooth with almost zero wrinkles.
The image itself seemed not to be filtered nor Photoshopped, attempting to disband the circulating rumor that Gwen was heavily editing her photos.
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;
n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,
document,’script’,’
fbq(‘init’, ‘752905198150451’);
fbq(‘track’, “PageView”);