A picture of Queen Elizabeth II by Andy Warhol in the Royal Collection at The King's Gallery

  • Mail on Sunday understands the Collection Trust does not have any such photos 

There are no photographs of the Duchess of Sussex in the Royal Collection, The Mail on Sunday can reveal. 

This is despite the vast archives containing more than a million objects spanning five centuries of the monarchy. 

Works from the collection are often displayed at royal properties, including the King’s Gallery next to Buckingham Palace, which is currently holding an exhibition titled ‘Royal Portraits: A Century of Photography’. 

But while the display has delighted visitors with previously unseen photos of Queen Elizabeth II and Princess Margaret, tourists have been surprised to find no images of Meghan Markle or her two children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet.

The MoS understands this is because the collection – which is cared for by the Royal Collection Trust, a department of the royal household – does not contain any such photographs. 

A picture of Queen Elizabeth II by Andy Warhol in the Royal Collection at The King's Gallery

A picture of Queen Elizabeth II by Andy Warhol in the Royal Collection at The King’s Gallery

The Collection holds more than a million Royal objects - but no pictures of Meghan Markle

The Collection holds more than a million Royal objects – but no pictures of Meghan Markle

A visitor examines a portrait by Paolo Roversi of The Duchess of Cambridge in November 2021

A visitor examines a portrait by Paolo Roversi of The Duchess of Cambridge in November 2021

Images of the Royal Family do not automatically become part of the Royal Collection, but are often donated by the photographer or specially commissioned.

Royal Portraits contains five photographs of Prince William, but there are no shots of the Duke of Sussex as an adult, and he features only once in a 1994 photograph taken by John Swannell.

It depicts a young Prince Harry laughing with his brother William and mother Princess Diana.

The Royal Collection is not owned by King Charles but rather ‘held in trust’ for ‘his successors and the nation’. 

A spokeswoman for the trust said: ‘Royal Portraits… focuses on photographs taken during organised portrait sittings’, adding that images from the collection were ‘chosen for what they can tell us about the evolution of royal portrait photography’.

You May Also Like

When the Dust Settles, Massie’s Constitution Suddenly Awakens

A Strike That Shook the Desert and the Dais In the…

How Trump changed the future, kill the suicide bill and other commentary

From the right: Don Just Changed the Future “In the case of…

Anthony Albanese makes stunning admission after finally backing Trump’s attacks on Iran – as he hits back at reporter’s simple question

By MAX AITCHISON, POLITICAL REPORTER FOR DAILY MAIL AUSTRALIA Published: 22:02 EDT,…

Thunder pull away from Pacers to win NBA championship after Tyrese Haliburton’s Game 7 injury

The Thunder’s dominant season is now complete with a championship. They pulled…