Up next
Don Schumacher Net Worth
CARMEN Electra has shared a lineup of her best magazine cover photos – but fans believe the post has an underlying message for another celebrity.
The Baywatch star modeled for Kim Kardashian’s shapewear brand over the summer.
5
5
5
Now Carmen, 51, has shown off her hottest magazine covers in a sexy new post on Instagram.
The actress took to the platform on Thursday to share the major throwbacks with her 1.7 million followers.
The first image in the compilation was the model’s April 2003 Playboy Magazine cover.
In the shot, Carmen posed nearly nude, using a red electric guitar to cover her body.
Read more on Carmen Electra
The explicit star wore just a beaded thong with matching necklaces and bracelets as she gave the camera a smoldering look.
The Scary Movie star had her caramel hair styled half up and half down and wore full glam makeup for the shoot.
Carmen included several other slides of her best magazine covers, Cosmo, Vulkan, FHM, Runway, Glamaholic, Maxim, another Playboy, and Femme Fatales.
She captioned the post: “When someone says i have issues, yah i guess i do. #covergirl #magazine #playboy #maxim #fhm #cosmopolitan.”
Fans flooded the comments section with compliments for the sexy star.
But some suggested that there was a secret intention behind the hot post.
“Getting kims attention to pose for skims again lol,” one claimed.
CARMEN FOR SKIMS
Back in July, Carmen and Jenny McCarthy paired up with Kim Kardashian’s brand Skims for a sexy photoshoot.
In one of the photos, the Good Burger star mimicked her 2003 Playboy shoot by posing with a guitar similarly while wearing a Skims one-piece bathing suit.
The 50 and 51-year-old actresses were the stars of the shapewear brand’s marketing campaign.
The Meet The Spartans alum posted a video of her in Skims on Instagram to promote Kim’s, 42, new swimwear line.
Read Related Also: Saint West, 8, photobombs Kim Kardashian’s video with ‘savage’ gesture as disgusted star yells ‘ew!’
The blondes were both wearing matching tiny black string bikinis that showed off their amazing bodies and underboob.
The superstars were standing in front of a red tile wall and a bright red car.
Each was armed with a sudsy red sponge as they pretended to wash the car, but focused on washing themselves.
At one point, Jenny was on the ground scrubbing the floor while Carmen washed the car behind her.
They both seductively looked into the camera like they were posing for Playboy.
Jenny shared the snaps online and added: “I couldn’t be more excited to be a part of SKIMS’ latest campaign.
“The energy on set was incredible, especially shooting alongside Carmen, who looks amazing!”
“It felt like we were back in the ’90s, and years later we’re still having fun!”
Carmen captioned her post: “It’s a wet hot summer in @SKIMS Swim with me and @jennymccarthy #SKIMS.”
The pair have known each other for years after finding fame with MTV and Playboy modeling in the 1990s.
Carmen also starred in the popular show Baywatch in the late 1980s.
FAN REACTIONS
However, some critics on Reddit saw the ad and were immediately confused by the marketing decisions that were made.
One said: “Uhhh are they marketing for men to buy these? This isn’t it.”
“This looks very dated even though it’s a new ad,” wrote someone else.
A third added: “It’s very 98-05 era and in the worst ways. Those were my teenage years being bullied into thinking I have to look like this to be sexy.
“Super gross and misogynistic, especially today in 2023 with the internet being so accessible, there’s no reason for so much ignorance to think this is ok.”
Another commented: “So are they pivoting away from shapewear? Because this is being marketed like it’s lingerie in a men’s magazine.”
5
5
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;
n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,
document,’script’,’
fbq(‘init’, ‘752905198150451’);
fbq(‘track’, “PageView”);
