Ex-PM Paul Keating slams his own side of politics over AUKUS nuclear submarines deal claiming it’s Labor’s worst global decision since World War I – as he questions Anthony Albanese’s competence
- Paul Keating calls AUKUS pact worst deal in history
- He questions the speed of Labor accepting the deal
- The former Labor leader says China is not a threat
<!–
<!–
<!– <!–
<!–
<!–
<!–
Former prime minister Paul Keating has launched an extraordinary series of attacks on reporters and his own Labor side of politics over Anthony Albanese’s $368billion AUKUS nuclear submarines plan.
During an appearance at the National Press Club, the famously acid-tongued ex-PM saved up most of his ire for a reporter from the Sydney Morning Herald who was behind a series sounding the alarm about China last week.
‘Your paper is a disgrace,’ Mr Keating told journalist Matthew Knott. ‘After what you wrote … last week in that shocking presentation …. you should hang your head in shame.
‘I’m surprised you even have the gall to stand up in public and ask such a question, frankly.
‘You ought to do the right thing and drum yourself out of Australian journalism.
‘I mean, that’s the most egregious, the worst, the most bias presentation … I mean, if I were you, mate, I would hide my face and never appear again.’
The scathing spray was just one small part of Keating’s performance – which included swipes at Anthony Albanese, Richard Marles, Penny Wong, US President Joe Biden, intelligence agencies and virtually any reporter who dared ask him a question.
He described Labor’s decision to buy nuclear submarines as the worst international decision by an ALP government since World War I.
When Sky News journalist Olivia Caisley asked how he was so sure China was not a military threat to Australia, Mr Keating responded with withering scorn.
‘Because I’ve got a brain. Principally.
Read Related Also: John Lydon's wife Nora Forster dies aged 80 after Sex Pistol told of her battle with Alzheimer's
‘And I can think. And I can read. And I read every day.
‘I mean, why would China want to threat… What would be the point? They get the iron ore, the coal, the wheat. What would be the point of China wanting to occupy Sydney and Melbourne? Militarily?’
‘And could they ever do it? Could they ever bring the numbers here? It would be an armada of troop ships to do it.
‘So you don’t need a briefing from the dopey security agencies that we have in Canberra to tell you that. I mean, I know you’re trying to ask a question, but the question is so dumb, it’s hardly worth an answer.
Mr Keating accused the Albanese government of accepting the $360 billion deal, which was negotiated by the by preceding Morrison government, in just 24 hours.
‘How would you do this in 24 hours?’ Mr Keaing asked.
‘You can only do it if you have no perceptive ability to understand the weight of the decisions you’re being asked to make.
Former Labor prime minister Paul Keating has lashed the Albanese government over the AUKUS defence pact
‘It’s what other people call incompetence. I’ll call it maybe “trying”.’
Calling it the worst decision by a Labor government since World War I prime minister Billy Hughes supported conscription Mr Keating said the whole deal was based on the false notion that China poised a direct threat to Australia.
‘This is a distortion and it’s untrue,’ Mr Keating said of this idea.
‘The Chinese have never implied that they would threaten us or said it explicitly.’
